The punishment of the court below against the defendant (one year and two months of imprisonment, and 4.3 million won of collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Although the Defendant’s mistake is divided and agreed with the victim of injury at the court below, the Defendant had previously been sentenced to suspension of execution and was under the influence of the period of suspension of execution and was under the influence of the period of suspension of execution, it cannot be said that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the court below is heavy in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances of crime, and circumstances after crime; and (b) all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character, environment, circumstances after crime, and circumstances after crime.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, Article 247 and Article 30 of the Criminal Act" in Part 4 of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error in Article 247 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11731, Apr. 5, 2013; hereinafter the same) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act. "Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act" are clear that it is a clerical error in Article 246 (2) and (1) of the former Criminal Act. Thus, it is obvious that it is a clerical error in Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act. Thus, it is corrected that it is corrected ex officio pursuant to