2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, the defendant prevented the police officer from arresting him as a flagrant offender in violence by the police officer, and there was a trial expense with him; the police officer arrested him as a flagrant offender in the act of violence and attempted to stop the defendant while the police officer was carrying out the patrol but attempted to stop him; the defendant opened the back of the patrol police officer's chest and assault G out of the police officer, and opened the back of the patrol police officer's chest, and the F's statement related thereto corresponds to the police officer's statement from the police to the court below and consistent and consistent to the police officer's statement from the police to the court below. In full view of these circumstances, the facts charged of the crime of this case is sufficiently recognized.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.