차용금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Basic Facts
On or around February 2009, the Plaintiff was appointed as real estate brokerage assistant, and on or around March 2009, the Defendant constructed a new building on the ground of the land in paragraphs (1) through (3) of the [Attachment List (hereinafter “instant land Nos. 1 through 3”) as indicated in [Attachment List No. 1 through 13 (hereinafter “instant building”).
The Plaintiff and the Defendant came to know through the introduction of NN in 2008, and the Defendant, around March 2009, delegated to the Plaintiff an exchange contract with respect to the land No. 1 or 3 and the building of this case. The required expenses were paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff or paid by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff.
On March 9, 2009, between the defendant and the third party, the land of this case and the building of this case as well as the land of paragraphs (4) through (7) of the attached Table Nos. 1 to 3 and the building of this case as well as the land of this case listed in the attached list No. 4 to 3,00 (hereinafter “the land of this case or the land No. 4 to 7 of this case”) were exchanged, and the non-O agreed to pay the difference of KRW 20,00,000 to the defendant. The exchange contract was concluded between the defendant and the third party (hereinafter “the land No. 1 exchange contract of this case”).
G and O 3 others are the land of this case 4 through 7 and the land of this case 8 in the attached list owned by G on March 9, 2009 and the land of this case 8.
Section 14. Building No. 14. hereinafter referred to as the "Building No. 14. 14." on its ground.
B. B shall be exchanged, but G shall be paid the difference from the O and three other parties, and the land of this case and the building of this case shall be O and three other parties, and the land of this case and the building of this case No. 8 and the building of this case No. 14 shall not be the exchange contract for completing the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the defendant, and "the second exchange contract of this case".
AB concluded the agreement.
The defendant is in accordance with P, Q and R on March 9, 2009.