However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle B with low driving skills.

On June 1, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 00:20, and driven the “D” front of the “D” located in C at the Sih interesting City, driving the vehicle at an insular speed above the two-lanes from the breadths to the breadth of the breadth. The Defendant changed the two-lane to the two-lane.

Since the location is a section where a white solid line is installed at the entrance of an intersection, there was a duty of care to refrain from changing course to a person engaged in driving service, as the safety signs for limitation on career change are instructed.

Nevertheless, the driver neglected this and changed the course to the two-lane from the prohibition section for the change of the lane in white-ray, and caused the driver's vehicle's fluent driving of the victim E(the 42-year-old driver's license) to rapidly stop the shock.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, the injury to the driver E (year 42) of the victimized vehicle, such as light and sacratum salt, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the fluor G (age 45) of the fluor G (age 45) of the fluor, such as dluoral and fluoral, and the fluoral and tension

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A photograph of a traffic accident report, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a field photograph, and a photograph by cutting off screen images before a lock of damaged vehicles;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a medical certificate (E), and a copy of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is changed in the lane while the defendant is driving a vehicle on behalf of the defendant.