Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

around 16:03 on October 19, 2018, the Defendant, on the front side of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, destroyed the repair cost so that the Defendant, on the ground that the victim was on board a D taxi operated by the victim C on the front side of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, but, on the ground that the victim said that “the victim would use another taxi that was promised by another customer,” he was sucking out the back of the taxi into the outside of the vehicle by walking the back of the taxi in the taxi.”

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order is relatively minor; the Defendant appears to have reached the instant crime by contingency in the situation where health conditions have deteriorated due to an influence, depression, network symptoms, etc. In addition, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the instant crime shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the circumstances regarding sentencing under Article 51 of