[Criminal Power] On May 22, 2014, the Defendant appears to have been sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul East Eastern District Court, which was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, and on May 30, 2014, the date the indictment was finalized is deemed to have been written in writing.

The judgment became final and conclusive.

[2015 Height1458] The Defendant, around September 5, 2011, joined the victim F's mother G as a member of the apartment building construction project in the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central District Housing Association, which is promoted by the "E District Housing Association on behalf of the victim," on behalf of the victim in the E-area housing office located in Jung-gu Seoul Central District Housing Association, and paid KRW 437 million in the name of the association contributions, and paid KRW 20 million in the name of the association contributions. The victim shall be paid KRW 5 million in the building project in the same day under the name of the contract deposit.

9.8.25 million won was paid as down payment to the victim as down payment, which would cause the victim to purchase an apartment at a lower price, and thus would have the victim acquire the money by means of money transfer.

On January 4, 2012, the Defendant called the victim F’s mother G cell phone, and made the said G purchase of apartment units in E Regional Housing Association amounting to KRW 300 million. The written contract stated that the association contributions shall be paid for the completion construction of a stock company, a contractor, but it stated that it would transfer them to the completion construction company in line with the payment schedule if it is included in the I Account operated by the Plaintiff.

However, in fact, even if the defendant received money from the victim as the purchase price for apartment of the above E-area housing association, he did not deposit the money into the completion construction of the company, and did not intend to use it for other businesses with which the defendant had been employed, so the victim did not have the intention or ability to allow the purchase of the above E

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and receives 33,700,000 won from the victim to the account in the name of the I in which the defendant operated.