However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2017, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a door with a security card held in front of the 'E' 'E' of the victim D operation on the Daejeon Peong-gu C and the first floor; (b) stolen the Defendant’s property worth KRW 918,00,000 in total, including 118,00 won in cash, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, and 1, etc. of the victim’s ownership, which had been placed in the Kash-gu, Daejeon Peong-gu, Daejeon, and 1,000 in cash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the sand taken by a suspect at the time of committing a crime, such as a theft report, internal investigation report, a photograph by cutting down CCTV images on the site of the case, a photograph by cutting down the CCTV images of the suspect's residence, each investigation report, a photograph of damaged articles kept in the suspect's residence, and sand photograph of

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the confession of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the confession of the reason for sentencing; (c) the absence of the same criminal record; and (d) the recovery of considerable damage caused by the recovery of certain damage; and