If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

When any person intends to employ a foreigner, he shall employ a person having the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, on August 25, 2015, the Defendant employed six foreigners who did not have the status of stay that can work for six times, as described in the attached list of crimes, in C, a human resources supply company located in Gumi-si B and 101, which is a human resources supply company, where the period of stay expires, and employed D, a foreigner of the nationality of the fatherland who does not have the status of stay that can work for six times from around that time to October 16, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a notice of decision on examining an immigration offender, a written notice of decision on examining an immigration offender, a certificate of employment of foreigners, a contract on entrustment of affairs, a list of registered foreigners' records

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.