When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 00:45 on March 14, 2014, the Defendant, at the main point of “C” located in Ansan-si, Masan-si B, Annsan-si, and recommended the Defendant to return home from the slope E belonging to the above main point after receiving the report of 112 from the proprietor of the above drinking house that the Defendant carried the fright, and went out of the said main point, but he returned to the outside of the said main point. However, after diving, the Defendant returned back to the front of the main point and opened the door again. The Defendant, after walkinging the door several times from the slope and walkinging the door from the slope E, she emblings his fat with his fat and fating it, and assaulted the door one time at drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the proper execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order and crime control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 (1) of the choice of punishment (the choice of fines in consideration of the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, there is no record of punishment for the obstruction of performance of official duties, and that the owner of the head of the instant head office does not want the punishment

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;