beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단1959

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, as the Director of the Management Office of the Korea Market Merchants Association in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si, was in charge of the application, management, etc. of subsidies from the said merchant Association.

The victim Changwon-si decided to grant subsidies to 90% of the personnel expenses when the above Dmarket merchants' association selected as the subsidized business operator employs delivery human resources as part of the traditional market suicide, and the victim's Small and Medium Enterprise Market Promotion Corporation decided to grant subsidies to 90% of the personnel expenses when the above Dmarket merchants' association selected as the subsidized business operator employs delivery human resources and call center human resources as part of the traditional market suicide.

The said Dmarket Merchants’ Association is selected as a subsidized project operator of the said D Market in Changwon-si and received subsidies by filing an application for subsidies from October 201 to December 2013 by submitting a list of delivery personnel.

In addition, the said Small Enterprise and Market Service was selected as a subsidized business operator of the said micro enterprise and received subsidies from August 2013 to December 2014 by submitting a list of the delivery personnel and call center personnel. From July 2014, the said Small Enterprise and Market Service decided to reduce the subsidization rate from 90% to 50%, and the said Small Enterprise and Market Service granted each subsidy from July 2014 to December 2014 for 50% of personnel expenses and 40% of personnel expenses.

Around October 2011, the Defendant entered the Dmarket Merchants' Office in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-si, as delivery personnel by false entry of E without any volume employed as actual delivery personnel, and even though the Defendant entered into an agreement to pay KRW 500,000 per month to F, the delivery personnel by false entry of the agreement to pay KRW 1,086,80 per month to F, and the name of Changwon-si is unknown.