교육환경보호에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2.5 million won) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant had already been subject to criminal punishment for the same offense in around 2016, and was discovered while continuing to engage in business again at the same place.
In full view of the factors and sentences of the sentencing in this Court, the sentencing of the court below exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion, when determining the sentencing.
There is no circumstance that it is deemed unfair to maintain the judgment of the court below as it is or that the judgment of the court below is unfair.
In addition, even if the circumstances and results of the instant crime were to be considered after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the sentence of the lower court is deemed to be adequate and too unreasonable.
3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.