농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) did not indicate the country of origin since the Defendant sold a boiler indicating the country of origin on the top of the “stttttttttttt Packaging,” with a domestic product, on which the Defendant displayed it.
2. Determination
A. The witness E bears the testimony of the trial court to the effect that the evidence seems consistent with the defendant's defense that the country of origin submitted by the court of the trial is attached with the Staksong-2, 1-3 (Saks Data No. 1-2, 1-3) and the witness E to the effect that "the defendant sold them by placing the Staks wings Packaging Packings supplied by the defendant on the Goaks Packaging Packings
① However, the Defendant, in the course of investigation, sold only the Cheongdo Jeju Island to the United Nations Es. The Defendant purchased the Cheongdo Jeju Jeju Jeju Province at a permanent agricultural cooperative marketing center and screened the Cheongdo Jeju Jeju Province in the store and sold it to the rest area. On July 27, 2012, the Defendant stated that the Cheongdo Jeju Province only sold the Cheongdo Jeju Province (Evidence No. 33 through 35 of the evidence record). The Defendant stated in the lower court that “The Defendant’s Gado Jeju Island was partly using the Gado Jeju Island (Public Trial Record No. 15 page),” ② The employees of the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Center of the National Agricultural Products, at the time of regulating the Gado Jeju located in the Gado. (Evidence No. 7 through 9 of the evidence record) that the Defendant’s Gado Jeju Province was exposed to the Gado Jeju Island, and the Defendant’s Gado Jeju Island’s Gadok’s Dok’s Dok’s Ga.