However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant, while committing the crime, knew of the fact that C (the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) on June 2010) is serving as a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) at the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office located in the Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Office, he/she would inform C of the fact that B is serving as a member of the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) and would allow C to receive an undetained investigation upon his/her personal request.

The purpose of this paper is to acquire money by fraud.

On June 2010, the Defendant conspired with B to call the victim C at an infinite place and called “I would have to solve the finite?” B along with B before the Military Art Center in Yapo-si, Kunpo-si, Kunpo-si, and B is the victim “I will have to be punished by Incheon Skindo.”

I would like to explain the content of the case and to find out whether the case can be undetained.

"Isle to Incheon and again, Isle to the victim "Isle to investigate by non-detention" after having been explained to D.

was made.

50,000,000 won is delivered to D, and D will have D gain access to E and D of the Ansan branch office.

“Around July 2010, the Plaintiff received KRW 50 million from the injured party.”

However, at the time, even if the defendant and B received KRW 50 million from the injured party, they thought to use them without delivering them to D, such as the victim's statement, and they could be investigated by non-detention from D, and they did not say that they would persuade E and D of the Ansan Branch Office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with B, received KRW 50 million from the injured party, by deceiving the injured party, and by receiving KRW 50 million from the injured party, and at the same time received delivery of KRW 50 million under the pretext of soliciting the case handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1.Each prosecution with respect to B.