Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On July 9, 2015, at around 17:50, the Defendant took a bath to the victim on the ground that he did not pay the victim F (e.g., 52 years of age) interest at the E office located in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Seoul. In doing so, the Defendant was able to take care of the victim’s right shoulder and right shoulder with his hand, and the victim was able to take care of the victim for 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Voluntary accompanying report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (F);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment.

4. The Defendant, who judged the issue of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, was not at the time of having committed an assault against the injured party.

The argument is asserted.

Therefore, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the court, comprehensively taking into account each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the victim from the investigative agency to the court, to the point of time by the victim’s right clocks.

As the statement is made, the victim's statement is consistent and concrete, and it is reliable because the victim's statement is also consistent with the victim's statement. ② The victim's statement also complies with the victim's statement. ③ The victim was diagnosed at the hospital on the day following the date of the occurrence of the case, ③ The victim was diagnosed at the hospital, the part and degree of the injury stated in the diagnosis statement correspond to the victim's trade name; ④ The defendant also threatened the police officer dispatched immediately after the case with D in knife.

only made a statement and the victim was assaulted by the defendant

In the situation of assertion, he denied it or was assaulted by himself against the person who suffered damage.

The assertion appears to have never been made (Evidence Nos. 3, 4, 28).