Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

At around 00:30 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant committed an act in which the employee B (the 49-year-old) was frighted within the “Datt” located within the “Datt,” which was located within the “Datt,” and the Defendant was frighted in B while taking place at his will (the part is indicated in the explanation of the circumstances of this case) and she was fright to escape, and the victim E (the 53-year-old, the 53-year-old, the son) who is the owner of this case was fright to move out of the her will, and assaulted the victim E (the 53-year-old, the son was waiting for having reported) on two occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the spot and of violence photo;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act / [the dismissed part] The summary of the charge is as follows: around 00:30 on September 16, 2018, the Defendant committed an act in which an employee B (the age of 49) was an employee of the victim B (the age of 49) within the “Datt” located within the “Datt” located within the original city of Dai-si. Accordingly, the Defendant was able to walk up one time on the right side while the defect, “Ihnhh, Mahnhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Judgment

Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is a crime of non-compliance;