A. On March 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant acquired a private teaching institute located in Samdong-gu C from Samyang-gu Co., Ltd. and entered into a contract with Dental Institute (hereinafter “instant private teaching institute”) to jointly operate it with their own shares of 1/2.

B. On March 16, 2009, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a consignment operation contract entrusting the operation of the instant private teaching institute to the Representative EF Co., Ltd., with the exception of financial matters.

C. Around July 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant transferred the instant private teaching institute to Sam-sung Co., Ltd. and filed a report on the closure of business with respect to the instant private teaching institute around the end of July 2010, when operating the instant private teaching institute.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 17, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On February 29, 2012, when the Plaintiff arranged the instant private teaching institute to determine the cause for the principal claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 4,441,030, 34,40,000 as the cost of restoring to the original state from February 17, 2012 to March 20, 201; KRW 698,520,520; KRW 6,691,330; KRW 6,691,30; KRW 841,560 on April 8, 2011; KRW 841,560 on; KRW 85,00 on April 8, 201; KRW 205; KRW 305,205; and KRW 205,65,205,250 on May 8, 2011 to July 22, 2013.

On August 6, 2012, the Plaintiff claimed that KRW 6,00,000 should be paid from the Defendant since the Plaintiff spent KRW 3,000,000 with the cost of change of use on or around September 20, 2012 as the cost of reinstatement, and that KRW 1/2 of this cost should be paid from the Defendant. However, the Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 5 and 6 is respectively.