A. In fact-finding, the Defendant and C had no physical contact with F, and the Defendant testified as they were, which is not a perjury.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 1,00,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below and the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts recognized as follows by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the trial court: ① the defendant and C found F in order to resist the defendant's her father's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son, etc.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

B. C on the assertion of unfair sentencing is an element of sentencing favorable to the defendant, and it appears that the defendant's perjury was convicted of a fine of KRW 300,000,000, and that the defendant's perjury was not significantly affected in the trial, and that the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of offense

However, perjury is a serious crime that interferes with the trial for finding the truth of the court and causes confusion and incompetence in the judicial action of the country, and it is necessary to punish the defendant strictly.