beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.08.13 2014고정177

상해

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged was that the Defendant was accompanied by C’s drive, but around October 29, 2013, the Defendant was faced with E and the Defendant who was on the front of a restaurant with the trade name, i.e., “S. Bedkin,” located in Daejeon-dong 41-10, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on October 29, 2013.

Defendant and C did not go to E but did not go to E, and the Defendant talked to the effect that the cause of an accident occurred to E, and the E and son F were assaulted from F (23 years of age), and the Defendant opposed to the assault, and the Defendant took part in the assault against the Defendant, who was f (23 years of age), followed up approximately 14 days of the victim’s shoulder on a one-time check, etc., requiring approximately 14 days of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant asserts to the effect that, although F was able to commit assault and assault to F, the F did not inflict any injury by drinking or drinking F. However, the Defendant asserts that F did not do so.

On the other hand, the written diagnosis of the injury of this case is indicated as "the cause of injury", "the name of injury: the name of the person in question", "the name of the person in question: the name of the person in question, the name of the person in question, the name of the person in question, and the name of the person in need of the person in question." Meanwhile, the victim F stated at the time of the investigation by the police that "the person in question caused the defendant's drinking," but at the time of the investigation by the police, the victim F was "the person in question caused the defendant's drinking," but he stated in the court that "the person in question was sealed. The person in question, who was the defendant and the person in question, wanted to have the drinking, but the person in question would go to go to the hospital, so he would go to the next day." It is difficult to say F's statement at the police

In the beginning, the prosecutor prosecuted the Defendant at the time when he was charged with harming the F's shoulder at a time by drinking the F's shoulder, but changed the facts charged that the Defendant inflicted the above injury by pushing the shoulder by hand according to the results of the examination of the witness, and then, the prosecutor changed the facts charged that the Defendant sustained the above injury. The degree of b0 male who attempted to commit the assault is to have the shoulder 20 times by pushing it on the floor of his hand.