beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.05.28 2019고단3772

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B, as a partnership business, operated the 'E' place of sexual traffic in the 5th floor of the 5th floor of the Goyang-gu, Goyang-si. The profits were divided into 3:7. Defendant C lent the name of the representative of the euthanasia and received KRW 2.5 million a month in return for the lease of the name of the representative of the euthanasia as a person with visual disability 1.

On July 16, 2019, around 19:40, the Defendants shared their roles as above and provided guidance to 1.60,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from male customers F at the above massage place, and provided guidance to 10,000 won, so that G, an employee of sexual traffic, would have sexual intercourse with the above male customers, as well as arranging the above sexual intercourse from July 1, 2019 to July 16, 2019, the Defendants received 1.60,000 won to 200,000 won from the unspecified male customers who wish to engage in sexual traffic in return for sexual traffic from around July 16, 2019.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site photographs, such as carx details, business registration certificate, copies of passbooks, agreements, rights transfer and takeover contracts, statement of account transactions, and investigation report (report on the calculation of an additional collection charge);

1. Application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes in Chapter 3 (No. 2) of the 50,000 won issued by the Bank of Korea confiscated;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A and B of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The Defendants A and B committed the instant crime even though they had been sentenced to a fine due to the same kind of crime under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic.

Defendant

A and B attempted to conceal crimes.

This is.