Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a resident of the Jung-gu Seoul Central Airport.

From February 24, 2015, the Defendant, from around 20:00 on February 24, 2015 to around 20:20, at the conference room of the council of occupants' representatives in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, there are about 20 persons, including the Dong representative, victims D, the head of the apartment management office, and participating residents, and thereby, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out the fact that “The Defendant was a drinking person according to the apartment management rules, who was the 9 Dong representative, was subject to a fine of fine of KRW 70,00,000.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the provisional payment order. The Defendant asserted that the contents of the Defendant’s statement are true facts and public interest, and thus, illegality is excluded pursuant to Article 310 of the Criminal Act. However, in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment, namely, the Defendant’s statement when the Defendant talks with the victim at the same conference, and the scope of the other party’s statement and the contents of the statement, etc., the Defendant’s statement cannot be deemed as an act for

Therefore, the above argument is not accepted.