However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 03:15 on December 15, 2014, the Defendant found a complaint about the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to a fine due to insult and the cancellation of the owner of the government office in the Busan Jin-gu Busan City Police Station C district located in B prior to the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, and the Defendant presented a disturbance to the relevant C district unit, such as “I sent a fine of one million won, because I n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n.h.).”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence), the motive and method of committing the crime are very poor, but there is no same kind of power, and the confession is contrary to it.