However, each of the crimes of this case committed on board is committed by the Defendant, on 24 occasions, theft of the victim’s money and valuables, etc. after the Defendant’s entrance into the door due to the death of the body, etc., and attempted to steals money and valuables by taking back handbags owned by the victim H, which was located in the seat of the vehicle located in the vehicle located in the face of the door, but there was no money and valuables, but there was no money and valuables. There was no planned, professional, and repeated crime, and there was a little amount of damage, and the Defendant could have been sentenced to punishment for larceny or attempted larceny.

However, considering the fact that the amount of damage caused by each of the larcenys in this case is KRW 23 million, and that the Defendant has no criminal record after being punished for attempted larceny in 2008, and that there is wrong recognition of and reflects on the mistake, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing in this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed to be too uneasible and unreasonable.

Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.