성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B’s fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine of 5,00,000 won, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the actual owner of a massage treatment establishment in the name of "F" located in Daegu Magu E, 2-3 stories, Defendant B is the business owner in the name of the above massage treatment establishment, Defendant C is the head of the above massage treatment establishment in the name of Defendant A, and Defendant C is the head of the above massage treatment establishment in the body of Defendant A.
1. Defendant A and B’s joint crimes (from July 13, 2013 to June 14, 2016) proposed that Defendant B would have the name of the head of the place of massage treatment (hereinafter referred to as “the head of the place of massage treatment”) and provided that Defendant B would have the name of the place of massage treatment (hereinafter referred to as “the head of the place of massage treatment”) KRW 1,500,000 per month in consideration of the fact that Defendant B would have the name of the place of massage treatment, and that Defendant B would be stationed in the said place of massage treatment. From July 13, 2013 to June 14, 2016, Defendant B would have a female employee of the said place of massage treatment, including G and H, receive 170,000 won from male customers visiting the said place, and made the said female and the said female to divide them into sexual traffic.
As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a commercial broker from July 13, 2013 to June 14, 2016.
2. Defendant C and other Defendants’ joint criminal acts (from March 2015 to June 14, 2016), Defendant C, from March 2015, to March 14, 2015, decided to be the head of a department at the place of the above massage practice operated by Defendant A on the ground that Defendant B was the president of the place where Defendant B was placed. From that time to June 14, 2016, Defendant C and other Defendants were in charge of duties, such as providing customers with sexual traffic in return for the payment of sexual traffic, and guiding them to a room where sexual traffic is located.
As a result, Defendant C conspired with other Defendants to act as a broker for sexual traffic from March 2015 to June 14, 2016.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in H and G;
1. A copy of a on-site photograph, real estate lease contract, or Daegu bank passbook;
1. The Act and subordinate statutes governing the investigation report (the calculation of additional collection charges);