beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.09.26 2012고단3551

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Ulsan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ulsan Detention House on February 6, 2010.

On January 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the coffee shop near the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seodong Seosan, “A husband and a her husband who has been in de facto marital relationship with the victim is currently in a lawsuit.” (b) On the other hand, the Defendant received a loan from the National Bank to the head of the National Bank, and made an investment in the shares through E, a branch of the National Bank in Seocheon-cheon, which is the head of the Korean church and the head of the National Bank in fathercheon-do, and was punished by KRW 6.6 billion. However, due to the litigation, the Defendant cannot receive KRW 6.6 billion. Therefore, if the Defendant created one passbook, she shall be paid KRW 3.6 billion out of the above KRW 6.6 billion in the form of transfer. On the other hand, it is difficult to pay 3.6 billion won in cash instead of paying D-do bankruptcy.” (c) On the other hand, it is difficult to first pay 3.6 billion won in cash to the National Bank.

However, the defendant did not have a passbook with 10 billion won deposited. The defendant did not have a passbook with investment of 6.6 billion won, and it did not have to pay 3.6 billion won with the passbook of the victim. The defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the victim's debt.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 6 million from the victim on January 16, 2012, and acquired KRW 171,743,00 in total on 17 occasions from around that time to July 19, 2012, as stated in the attached crime list, including the transfer of KRW 6 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Details of transactions of inputs;

1. Photographs of false text messages;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Criminal records, personal identification and confinement status, investigation reports (Attachment to a judgment).