A. The sentence of the lower court (a fine of five million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and the primary crime is favorable to the defendant, but the fact that the defendant did not receive the letter without restoring the damage to the victim is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, considering the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s sentence is deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.