1. Around November 18, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures to be taken after accidents) driving a motor vehicle with a c presson c presson in order to drive the motor vehicle, thereby driving the motor vehicle along the three-lanes prior to the ecticon D located in Seojin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City in the previous city along the three-lanes of the ecticon.

There are three-distance crossings in which signal apparatus is installed, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the motor vehicle by complying with the signal of the front side and by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as entering the intersection by checking well the front side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this while under the influence of alcohol and entered the intersection in contravention of the signal, thereby making it difficult for the Defendant to turn to the left from the right side of the road in accordance with the new subparagraph. However, the Defendant received the part of the left side of the victim FI driver G of the victim FI driver's G, who entered the intersection in order to turn to the left from the right side of the road.

The Defendant got away without immediately taking necessary measures, even though he damages the above low-priced car to the extent equivalent to KRW 3,677,793 of the repair cost due to occupational negligence above.

2. The Defendant was in violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the foregoing accident) and was required to respond to the measurement of drinking in a manner of inserting the breathm between around 19:40, around 19:52, and around 20:02, and around 30:02, when there were reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant’s brea-Jan Police Station I district unit belonging to the Haak-gu Police Station I district in the Jeondong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which was called after receiving a report of drinking in front of the Hmat located in D Special Metropolitan City.

Nevertheless, the defendant shall avoid this and shall not comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking without any justifiable reason.