If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On December 24, 2016, around 15:40 on December 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, D Operation 'E'; (b) on the ground that: (c) the Defendant received the Defendant’s demand from the Victim F, who was the victim F, who was the seat of D and fright, who was the seat of D; and (d) the police officer was dispatched to the Defendant’s report; and (d) on the ground that the police officer’s demand that the police officer was sent to the Defendant, the Defendant

Chewing franchis, Mah, Mahman, Mahn, and continue to be observed by F, the police officer G and the victim H “I or magazine?” while continuing to be observed by F;

I was similar to that.

이 씹할 놈들 아, 씹할, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐

‘The Methical theory' was put into place.

Accordingly, the victims were insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each statement of F, G and H;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;