[2015 Height70] On October 23:10, 2014, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol on the e-art front of the E-art set set in D at D at D at D at D time, was on a multiple occasions, and thereby, damaged the repair cost of the said car to the extent that the 3.9 million won of the repair cost is equal to that of the said car.

[2015dan476] On May 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 20:03 on May 20, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) reported 5 parts of the fire that were located adjacent to the entrance of the victim J, which was located adjacent to the entrance of the Igrari-si, and (c) destroyed the said parts of the fire that was collected from the fire without any reason; and (d) destroyed the said parts of the fire that was destroyed by the fire.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 70]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Photographs of the damaged vehicle (2015 highest 476);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written Statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the sentence of sentence is inevitable in view of the fact that it is recognized that the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act reflects his mistake, but the sentence of sentence is inevitable, considering the fact that there are five previous crimes of the same kind and five previous crimes, no recovery of damage has been made at all, and

In addition, the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case.