도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On July 10, 2006, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. from an Ansan Branch of Suwon District Court on July 10, 2006, and a summary order of KRW 3 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from an Ansan Branch of Suwon District Court on December 12, 201.
On May 8, 2015, at around 23:20, the Defendant driven Csch Rexroth car under the influence of alcohol by 0.140% without obtaining a driver’s license from around approximately 500 meters in a section from the front day of the Gao-dong Emba-dong, Ansan-dong to the road of the 913-17 Embio-dong.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on the state of the operation of a motor vehicle;
1. Registers of driver's licenses;
1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind as a suspect);
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (a point of driving under the influence of sound), subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. In light of the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, even though there are many criminal records of the same kind, the crime of this case is not good. However, the defendant's self-fashion in the vehicle is regulated, there is no evidence to deem that the defendant continued to operate the vehicle in his/her own city in his/her ordinary city, and there is no other evidence to believe that the defendant continued to operate the vehicle in his/her ordinary city without a license, and all other circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's health is good and