Seized evidence 2 through 5 shall be confiscated from the accused.

On October 10, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in the Daegu District Court’s Port Branch Branch on the part of October 10, 2013, and on April 10, 2014, the Defendant completed the enforcement of the sentence in the port prison.

On September 14, 2014, at around 23:00, the Defendant came to a nearby road located in Yong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul, and cut off approximately KRW 628,872 of the market price of Korea Electric Power Corporation, which is owned by the Korea Electric Power Corporation, by cutting off approximately 150m of the “B” (the single size of approximately 60sq, approximately 1cm of thickness, 150m of old material) with safety boom belts installed in the above road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The records of seizure, the list of seizure, each investigation report, two copies of each photograph, and the estimates of damage;

1. Division: Results of the inspection of prisoners, records of criminal records, replys to criminal records, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a written judgment;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. For the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the Defendant has the record of having been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a larceny crime under the same law, and there is a need to sentence the Defendant to commit the instant crime again on several months after the execution of the sentence is completed.

However, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, family environment, means of crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the defendant led to a confession of the crime of this case and reflects the depth thereof, the damaged goods were temporarily returned to the victim, and the defendant deposited the amount equivalent to the damaged amount for the victim, and other circumstances