2. The Defendant acknowledges, reflects, and does not repeat the instant crime in the future.

The distance of the defendant's driving is not relatively long, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim of the traffic accident caused by the crime of this case.

Meanwhile, at the time of committing the instant crime, the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is very high, and the Defendant also caused a traffic accident due to the instant drunk driving.

In view of the fact that the Defendant had been sentenced to criminal punishment on several occasions due to drinking driving and driving without a license even though he had a record of being sentenced to criminal punishment, it is not good that the Defendant has driven a motor vehicle without a mandatory insurance.

The defendant did not cooperate with the investigation and was locked for a period of two years.

In addition, even if the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances before and after the crime, and various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments are considered, the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.