However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 6, 2015, the Defendant visited D, located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, for a price issue, visited D, who was called “A” and was called up upon receiving a report, and heard the circumstances of the case from E, etc., the Defendant sent to the police officer of the F District Police Station of the Southern-gu, Southern-gu, Police Station of the Republic of Korea: “A person illegally staying in the Republic of Korea who was called knife of this knife, knife, knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

In addition, the Defendant left the place of business and she returned home to G, “this son Lhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

In addition, the defendant was arrested as the current offender who interfered with the performance of official duties by the above act, and was abused by the head of the H face level in front of the F District in South-gu I at the time of sailing the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant committed a legitimate performance of duties by police officers with respect to 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (related to attachment of work place);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Formal concurrence, or the punishment prescribed in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the punishment imposed on a person who commits a crime heavier than that of H shall be punished, but his/her imprisonment shall be selected);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act [the scope of recommendations] is the case where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor. The number of public officials who suffered damage is large.