2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that is established on February 5, 1994 and is engaged in a financial business with approximately seven full-time workers in the Jeonyang-gun Co., Ltd.

B. On January 1, 1995, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was subject to disciplinary action on the following grounds (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) on November 7, 201, while serving as the chief of the Department of General Affairs and Department.

1.Before June 11, 2008, for officers and travel expenses of the D President 9,990,000

2.2.2.208-2016 2.200 ..200 .200 .200 .200 . 200 .

3.2.08-2016 2008-2016,000 won 18,006,000 won

4.(former)Dual payment of 200,000 won for executive officers and travel expenses of the E president (on November 11, 2014)

5. Names of regular intervenors (from June 1, 2009) and unfair-use items;

6. Soft gift E personal cards of KRW 3,250,700 ( September 22, 2009);

7. Dual payments for F marriage festivals ( March 18, 2015);

8. Unused entertainment expenses of 679,000 won after the election registration of the President of the E (former) was made (for example, February 6, 2016).

C. On October 25, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) held a personnel committee and decided to dismiss the Intervenor; (b) decided to dismiss the Intervenor; and (c) on November 7, 201 of the same year, the Plaintiff decided to dismiss the Intervenor; and (d) notified the Intervenor of the said disciplinary action.

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). D.

On January 26, 2017, the Intervenor filed an application for remedy with the Jeonnam Regional Labor Relations Commission (Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission) to the effect that the instant disciplinary action constituted unfair dismissal. On March 29, 2017, the Jeonnam Regional Labor Relations Commission first issued a trial court to the effect that the instant disciplinary action was defective in the disciplinary proceedings, the grounds for disciplinary action 4, 5, and 7 ports are recognized, and the disciplinary action was imposed, on the ground that the instant disciplinary action was deemed unfair.

E. On May 5, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed in the early inquiry tribunal and filed an application for reexamination with the National Labor Relations Commission as Central 2017 No. 421, but the National Labor Relations Commission rendered a decision dismissing the Plaintiff’s application for reexamination on July 18, 2017.

(c).