A. On September 14, 2014, the Plaintiff received a surgery to remove the left-hand absence from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant surgery”) from the Gucurology Durology C located in the Gucurology that the Defendant operated. From around 18:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff began to feel a serious part of the left-hand side.

Accordingly, on September 12, 2014, the Plaintiff was receiving medical treatment from DNA catology, and continued to provide pains. Ultimately, from September 14, 2014 to September 18, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the fattol National University’s catology hospital and received medical treatment to alleviate the above pains.

[Presumption diagnosis," which is the "presumed examination," of the record book of the corresponding room, is an essential stone.

On September 23, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to the CTT test at the GTP Hospital. A doctor E at the KGP Hospital prepared a statement on the following: “The Plaintiff was unable to attend the CT test: He was found to have been absent from kidy; he was unable to extend the left-hand side prior to the date; he was unable to undergo an emergency medical treatment due to a emulsion from the external shock shock. As a result of the CT test, he was confirmed to have been absent from the left-hand side and the blood species around kidy. At present, he was confirmed as having no continuous blood transfusion, and there was a stable physical signs, and there was no need for treatment such as the re-absorbing of the blood absorbing after the expiration of the stability period.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 5 (which include branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion was difficult for the Defendant to conduct the instant procedure after commencing the instant procedure, and F, a radiation engineer, was conducting the instant procedure.

In addition, before conducting the instant treatment, the Plaintiff was unable to hear the explanation that the instant treatment may result in blood transfusion from the Plaintiff, due to external shock and crushing.

However, the procedure of this case is due to the procedure of this case.