beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.10.04 2018고단758

전기통신사업법위반등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

3. Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall use, or use for the collection of the relevant funds by opening the mobile communications terminal device in another person's name, on the condition that funds are provided or lent, the mobile communications service provided for such mobile communications terminal device, and no one shall transfer or take over access media in using or managing access media.

The Defendants accessed those who have difficulty in economic situation, opened the mobile phone in their names on the condition that they set up the price of KRW 1,00,000 per mobile phone and monthly installments, and intended to sell and distribute profits from the mobile phone (one chip) removed from the core chip to other persons. Defendants A play the role of soliciting and selling the mobile phone owner, Defendant B runs the act of opening and selling the mobile phone, which is the mobile phone seller, and Defendant C operates the act of opening and selling the mobile phone, under the direction of Defendant A, and Defendant C operates the act of soliciting the mobile phone owner, Defendant D operates the “F” which is the sales store, and share the roles of opening the mobile phone at the request of Defendant B.

[2018 Highest 758] - Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D

1. The Defendants in violation of the Telecommunications Business Act of Defendant A and Defendant B opened 40 cell phones over 32 times in total from July 12, 2017, including the fact that: (a) the Defendants, at the port of port of May 6, 2015, had I prepare an application for new mobile phone entry; (b) the Plaintiff opened two mobile phone units (J andK) in the name of the deceased; and (c) sold the end to the unqualified; and (d) the end was sold to the unqualified person under the name of the deceased person after opening 40 cell phoness over a total of 32 times, such as No. 1 to No. 32 of the daily list of crimes in the attached Table 2017.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer or lend funds, thereby using the mobile communications terminal device in the name of another person for the collection of the funds.

2...