The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that all of the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations and by misapprehending the logical and empirical rules.

In addition, the adoption of the application for examination of evidence may not be examined when the court deems it unnecessary at the discretion of the court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Do3282, Oct. 10, 2003). Thus, the court below's rejection of the defendant's application for examination of evidence cannot be deemed unlawful on the ground that the court below did not accept

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.