If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

On April 16, 2016, from around 20:55 to 21:10 on the same day, the Defendant found himself in Gwangju Northern-gu B and from the victim C (n, 60 years of age) in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C (n, 60 years of age) to have been under the influence of alcohol, and entered the same in order to mislead him that he had been assaulted and had been subject to apology.

Therefore, although the victim stated that "A. B." is the defendant, the defendant does not respond to the defendant, and the defendant will only take care of the medical expenses for daily treatment to the male guest who was in his/her place without having complied with it.

The term “intersection” and “intersectioned.”

On the other hand, the defendant continued to see many unspecified customers, and had them leave the disturbance, and interfere with the victim's restaurant business for about 15 minutes by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. Application of the C’s written statements (10 pages, 41 pages) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;