게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Seized evidence as referred to in subparagraphs 1 through 16 shall be confiscated.
Punishment of the crime
On November 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Ulsan District Court, which became final and conclusive on March 24, 2017 and is currently under the suspended sentence.
1. No one shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase any tangible or intangible outcome obtained through the use of a game product in the C Game Chapter or D Game Chapter for a business;
The Defendant’s head of the Ulsan Northern-gu E and the fourth floor (from around February 14, 2017).
3. The head of the C Game from March 24, 201 to March 15, 201
4. Until December 23, 200, employees of D Game heads were recruited to engage in money exchange operations together with G, H and employees, who are unemployed owners, G, H and employees, I, J and K.
According to the above public offering from February 14, 2017 to April 23, 2017, the defendant, I, J, and K input money in the above C Game room, etc., and settled the winning points in the game according to the game (the picture or the picture) that the customers appeared while carrying out the game, and then exchange the amount of money calculated by deducting 10% of the commission from the amount converted into one point into one won. The F made a settlement of profits by managing and managing the overall operation of the game room, such as the lease of the game room, the purchase of the game machine, and the employment of employees, and H was placed in the name of the C Game funeral, and H was placed in the pertinent game room as if it were controlled by each of the above heads of the D Game as if they were placed in the name of the D Game site.
Accordingly, the defendant exchanged the results obtained through the use of game water in collusion with F, G, H, I, J, K and K.
2. The Defendant N, who was the Defendant in relation to this part of the facts charged, No. 2017 High Order 3838, which was a case related to the former exchange in L Gameland, alleged that he was not the owner of the business.