2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. An incorporated association G (hereinafter referred to as the “instant incorporated association”) shall inspire women’s independence and self-reliance in line with the development of technology, informatization, and globalization on April 15, 1964, develop potential, achieve justice society and gender equality in the fields of politics, economy, education, culture, and home welfare, and contribute to the realization of welfare society through rational consumption. The Defendant is one of the 17 City/Do branches affiliated with the instant incorporated association.

In addition, the plaintiffs are the heads of subdivision belonging to the defendant, the plaintiff A is the heads of subdivision belonging to the defendant, the plaintiff B is the chief of subdivision, the plaintiff C is the chief of subdivision, the plaintiff C is the president of subdivision, and the plaintiff D is the chief of subdivision.

B. The instant incorporated association: (a) was at issue in which some members of the past president M, who were the instant incorporated association, are engaged in activities in N, a similar female association (name:O, date of establishment: August 8, 2013; hereinafter “N”), which is a similar female association with a competitive relationship by using the physical and human resources of the instant incorporated association; (b) held board of directors on December 11, 2018; and (c) decided to set a policy to ensure that the members of the instant incorporated association and N, who were the members of the instant incorporated association, who were the president, were to be engaged in activities only in one organization at their option; and (d) decided to send official letters to each branch, sub-branch, and operating institution, which urge them to express their clear comments.

C. Accordingly, on December 13, 2018, the instant incorporated association sent an official document with the following content to the recipient as “the head of the 17 City/Do branch, the 6 operating institutions, and the N-related cases,” respectively. As such, the recipient of the instant incorporated association: “The head of the 17 City/Do branch, the 6 operating institutions (P, Q, the R Center, S, T, and the head of the U Child Care Center) nationwide.”

(hereinafter “instant N NO”) G NO on December 13, 2018

D. After that, the incorporated association of this case sent again to the defendant a letter of merit with the same content as the official document dated January 9, 2019 and December 13, 2018, and hereinafter referred to as "the defendant was sent again."