beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.20 2015고단3312

특수절도등

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On February 13, 2014, A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on February 13, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 19, 2014.

Defendant

B suggested Defendant A to commit a crime that steals money in a marriage hall and take meals with an identification right, following the lack of living expenses, etc., and Defendant A consented thereto.

1. On January 25, 2015, the Defendants’ joint criminal conduct came to the “Ewa Holdings” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and Defendant B pretended as being the cause of receipt before the receipt stand, and Defendant A waiting against it.

Defendant

B As such, “victims” in the F facts charged is apparent that the F is a clerical error of “F” and thus correct as it is obvious that the F is a cause for the receipt of the amount of cattle.

It received three bags containing a total of 200,000 won in cash from the defendant A by using the gap in which they are mixed with others.

Defendant

A 3 bags delivered are placed above the reception stand as if they were paid with a stable, and the empty bags used in advance by a cre in which surveillance has been neglected have not been covered by three bags, and then put them into the main machine by moving the place.

Accordingly, the Defendants, together, stolen the total amount of KRW 200,000,000 owned by the victim G.

2. The Defendants, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, committed the crime, and thereafter, did not know the name of the recipient at the time and place, as described in Paragraph 1, and the fact that the Defendants did not know of the name of the recipient was a thief, but did not engage in a thief, and even if they did not pay for thief, did not look at the same attitude to pay for thief to the customer, and did not change the right of food.

As such, the Defendants deceiving the above receiver and deceiving it from the above receiver.