1. For the purpose of exercising private documents around August 16, 201, the Defendant modified the private document without authority, stating, in front of the part on the guarantee limit of joint and several sureties’s joint and several sureties’s letter prepared by each type M as the Defendant as the primary debtor, the Defendant modified the entries in the guarantee limit of the private document, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Around August 19, 2011, the Defendant used the altered private document at the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Yang Jae-dong 275 Office for Mobilization E&WnB (hereinafter “SA”)’s office, suggesting that a joint and several surety was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to joint and several sureties;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime: Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of recommendations based on the sentencing guidelines (determination of types), private documents, forgery, alteration, etc. (Scope of recommendations) shall be punished by imprisonment for six months from six months to two years (basic areas);

2. In full view of the fact that the defendant's error in the decision of sentencing is recognized and reflected, that the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the relevant case and currently pending trial in the appellate court by the Seoul High Court 2012No4422, and the age, character, conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the punishment as ordered shall be