농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the foreigner's worker working in the scam field at the time of the control of this case used the distribution network indicated as "the remaining scam of the ground" as "the scam of the actual water," and (b) there was no criminal intent of violating the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products, which falsely indicates the country of origin of the Defendant.
Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.
2. In light of the following circumstances revealed by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, including the statement at the court of the court below in the judgment witness D, etc., i.e., the National Agricultural Product Quality Institute D's Office of Pool and Poet, which was performing the control of this case, testified in the court of the court below that "at the time of the instant case, the Defendant testified that "the Defendant was using part of the distribution trend network, which was expressed in the southsansan as a result of the Defendant's direct management of the distribution network work, was being carried out", it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant was aware that at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was aware that it was false to indicate the place of origin of the North North
The above assertion by the defendant is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.