[2] The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment on March 12, 2010, with prison labor for an injury in the Sungnam Support of Suwon Friwon, and on May 30, 2014, issued a summary order of one million won for an assault, etc. on the support of Suwon Friwon, and on October 2, 2014, issued a summary order of five million won for an assault by the Daejeon District Court on December 8, 2014. On December 8, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual assault) in the Support of Suwon Friwon Friwon Friwon, and was sentenced to a summary order of one million won as an assault on December 15, 2014 from the Daejeon District Court Support to the Daejeon District Court on December 15, 2014, and was sentenced to an imprisonment with prison labor from Seoul Branch on May 16, 2016.

[2] On June 11, 2017, around 18:40, the Defendant, while drinking at the bus stops in Gwangju-si, placed 20 women and 2 female elementary school students at the bus stops in Gwangju-si, without any special reason. The Defendant habitually abused the victim by drinking 20 women and 2 female elementary school students, and the victim E was able to talk with the Defendant, and the victim E was able to talk with the victim by drinking her and drinking her face twice.

[2017 Highest 2489] The Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment as a crime of assault at the Seoul Southern District Court on September 1, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern District Court on November 15, 2016.

[2] On February 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) “H convenience store where the Victim G (at 57 years of age) located in F at Won-si on February 28, 2017, the Defendant received 50 won higher than that of other convenience stores” from the Defendant.

The two-years money shall be paid.

The Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine, Doctrineing, so that customers in the convenience store could not count and wait at the convenience store, and the Doctrine was discarded.

This is a threat of force to the defendant.