When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is employed by Co-Defendant D to operate a game room on the second floor of the old and US C building and takes charge of the business of the above game room, including exchange, etc.

No one shall allow anyone to perform speculative acts by using game products or leave him/her to do so.

Nevertheless, from October 26, 2013 to December 28 of the same month, the Defendant and D had customers perform speculative acts by making them pay in cash, after deducting 10% of commission from the points acquired in the game, when requested by an unspecified number of customers using “sea-to-sea” game machine, which is a type of “sea-to-sea current” game machine that was not classified in the above game site.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with D to commit a speculative act by using a game machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the third protocol of trial;

1. Examination of suspect suspect regarding D by the prosecution;

1. Each statement of E, F and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. The comprehensive report on internal investigation, field photographs, etc.;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the results of appraisal and revolving;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 44 (1) 1 and 28 subparagraph 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fines: Period of operation of game of this case, gains from criminal crimes, role of defendants, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;