2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. On February 16, 2017, the Plaintiffs asserted 1, 9, 16, and 21 of the instant patent invention as indicated in paragraph (b) below, as indicated in paragraph (1) below, are denied by comparable inventions 1. Claim 2, 10, 17, and 22 are claims 1, 6, and 13 according to comparable inventions 1, 3, and claim 7, 14 are denied by comparable inventions 1, 4, and the rest of claims is denied by comparable inventions 1 and 4. The Patent Tribunal claimed a trial for invalidation of a patent as to the entire claim of the instant patent invention as 2017Da4377, May 8, 2017, the Intellectual Property Tribunal publicly announced on May 20, 201 through 41 of the instant patent invention as described in paragraph (1) and the Patent Gazette No. 30-1, 205-2, publicly announced on May 27, 2010 to the public.

In the instant lawsuit, comparable inventions 1 is prior inventions 2 (A No. 5), comparable inventions 2 is prior inventions 3 (Evidence 6) and comparable inventions 4 is prior inventions 6 (Evidence 9).

The decision of this case was rendered to dismiss all the plaintiffs' requests for a trial on invalidation on the grounds that newness and non-obviousness are not denied.

B. The title of the invention of this case (Evidence 3) 1: B (2) filing date/registration date/registration date/registration number: summary of the invention C/D/Patent E3) technical field pertains to the structure and manufacturing method of the antenna using a circuit board.

(1) [1] . (D) The first floor (E) the first floor (E) the ITRC cross-rise (J) the first floor (J) the first floor (B), the first floor (A), the first floor (H), the upper floor (A), the upper floor (H) the contact of which (C) is applied.