도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 18,000,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On December 1, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
On June 17, 2020, around 22:18, the Defendant driven a F-to-purd vehicle in the state of alcohol concentration of about 0.179% under the influence of alcohol at approximately 5km from the front side of the south-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B to the same Gu D apartment E-dong parking lot.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. G statements;
1. Report on the circumstances of driving under influence of alcohol, report on the results of the control of driving under influence of alcohol, report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, investigation report, inquiry into the results of the control of driving under influence of alcohol, and vehicle photograph at the time of crackdown;
1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, reply reports (A) and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal investigation reports;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 148-2(1) and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the selection of a fine, the blood alcohol content high, the blood alcohol content high, the blood alcohol content in the past record of drunk driving) of the vehicle owned by the defendant to the effect that he/she will not drive under the influence of alcohol again, the vehicle owned by the defendant is scrapped, the vehicle of this case does not cause any traffic accident, the vehicle of this case does not have any history other than punishment imposed twice by a fine, and the present situation is commuting by bicycle or bus, etc.)
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.