A. Defendant A is a person who has completed a marriage report with D around June 17, 2009.

1) On January 2012, 2012, the Defendant sent a Matel 302 to B and once with B on the first time. (2) On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant used the Ftel 1008 to have a single sexual intercourse with B on the first time.

3) On April 2012, the Defendant 108, Ftel No. 1008, Ftel No. 1008, and 1 time-componed with B, which led to the Defendant’s cross-compon between B and B three times. The Defendant 2, despite being aware that he/she was his/her spouse, was a spouse, was sent to the Defendant 1, 2, and 3 times at the time and place indicated in the foregoing paragraphs.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 241 (1) of the Criminal Act, which constitutes a crime under Article 241 (2) of the same Act, and can be prosecuted only upon the complaint of the spouse under Article 241 (2) of the same Act. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that Defendant A’s spouse D, the complainant of the instant case, has revoked all the complaint against the Defendants around March 7, 2013, which was after the prosecution of the instant case was instituted. Accordingly, all of the prosecution against the Defendants