However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 23, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court, and KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on June 13, 2016.

On July 9, 2020, at around 00:57, the Defendant driven D QM6 car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.174% from the 1km section from the front day of Hop House, which may know the trade name in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the front day of C in the same Gu.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, and criminal investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same kind of power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing period of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act includes the defendant's records of the same crime, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place where the defendant was drunk driving, and the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered.