Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fine shall be imposed on the defendant.

가. 사실오인(제1원심판결에 대하여) 피고인은 피해자들에게 그래픽카드와 에어팟을 실제로 판매하려 하였으나 바빠서 배송을 못 하였을 뿐이지, 그 물품대금을 편취하려던 것은 아니었다.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which recognized the defendant's criminal intent of fraud is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. With respect to all of the original judgment of unreasonable sentencing (as to all of the original judgment of unfair sentencing), each sentence of the lower court (the first judgment of a fine of KRW 300,000,000 and the second judgment of a fine of KRW 1 million) is excessively unreasonable.

2. The Defendant filed an appeal against both the first and second original judgments, and the pleadings in the appeal case against each of the above original judgment were combined at the trial court.

Therefore, each of the crimes in the first and second original judgments, which were sentenced to the same kind of punishment against the defendant, is a concurrent crime under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and thus, one sentence should be sentenced pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act. Thus, the first and second original judgments cannot be maintained.

However, despite these reasons for reversal, the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts against the first judgment is still subject to the judgment of this court, so this is considered in the following three paragraphs.

3. 제1원심판결의 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 도출되는 다음과 같은 사실 또는 사정들, 즉 ① 피고인은 피해자들로부터 물품대금을 송금받을 당시 실제로 그래픽카드와 에어팟을 가지고 있지 않았던 것으로 보이는 점, ② 그 후 피해자들에게서 환불 요청을 받았음에도 대금반환 노력을 전혀 하지 않은 점, ③ 대금을 반환할 만한 재력도 없었던 것으로 보이는 점 등을 종합하면, 피고인은 그래픽카드와 에어팟을 판매할 의사와 능력이 없었음에도 피해자들로부터 그 대금을 지급받아 편취하였다고 넉넉히 인정된다.

Accordingly, the defendant's status.