구상금
1.The judgment of the first instance, including the claims extended in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
1. Basic facts
A. In accordance with Article 45 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract for the category of security first, second, and second, and personal automobile insurance contract for self-physical accidents (hereinafter “automobile insurance contract of this case”) with the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport as a truster of the business of guaranteeing automobile accident compensation designated by the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport to conduct prescribed business of guaranteeing automobile accident compensation, and as well as with the father C, his father, who is his father, of this case (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oba in this case”).
B. On October 14, 2012, at around 06:40, the Defendant driven the Oralba (hereinafter “instant Defendant Oralba”), and changed the fleet into one lane to drive the Petern in order to drive the Petern while driving in the middle parallel of sublime in the middle-gu, Incheon. After the change of the vehicle, the Plaintiff Oralba in the instant case, while driving in the lower place of the Defendant Oralba (hereinafter “instant Defendant Oralba”), and thereby, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the legle and the opening of pule and sloping in the upper place of the instant Defendant Oralba, etc., and the injury, such as B, in the left place of the upper part of the instant case, suffered from the injury, such as the flaba and the flaba, the upper part of the instant case, and the flab, the flab, the upper part of the upper part of the instant case.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.
The Plaintiff paid KRW 12,457,880, and KRW 8,088,260 from December 13, 2013 to April 18, 2014 to the victim E with medical expenses, etc. The Plaintiff paid KRW 5,000,000 to the insurer entrusted with the business of guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation, as the insurer entrusted with the business of guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation, and paid KRW 819,060 to B for medical expenses, etc. The Plaintiff additionally paid KRW 819,060 with the insurance proceeds from one’s own physical accident.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 16 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of the right of indemnity;
A. The plaintiff of the parties asserted: